The supply chain for electric vehicles could be the mother of all bullwhip effects

Jay Forrester wrote in his 1961 publication, Industrial Dynamics, about the now infamous bullwhip effect when small shifts in customer demand for products result in distorted responses from actors further upstream in the supply chain.

Many MBA students around the world are introduced to Forrester’s breakthrough procurement theory by playing the beer simulation game, developed by MIT. The lack of predictability in customer behavior can have wild responses four or five steps further upstream in a supply chain, resulting in huge delays to increased demand.

The disconnect between finance, mining companies, car battery manufacturers, automakers and consumers could result in the mother of all bullwhip effects over the next decade. Battery makers, while in agreement that the days of the internal combustion engine (ICE) are numbered, are still on the fence regarding the exact proportions of materials used in new projects. Carmakers, on the threshold of releasing their first ranges of electric vehicles (EVs), are hopeful that customers will not turn their noses up the price tag of EV cars. And this new supply chain is relying on mining companies to be able to deliver much higher quantities of targeted raw materials key to EV technology. Mining is waiting for Wall Street to bankroll that charge.

“The multi-billion dollar projects are off the table, even with this story coming through,” Colin Hamilton, managing director of commodities research at BMO Capital Markets, said at the recent CRU-Cesco conference in Santiago. “This is why we have a gap on the supply side.”

Not helping the matter is the continuously evolving technology going into EV batteries. Will vanadium prove to be a better material than lithium in large-scale batteries, for instance? Can nickel sulfate become an effective replacement to cobalt? Are hydrogen fuel cells (HFC) totally out of the picture? While there are very few HFC-fueled cars in the world, they tend to be located in areas such as Silicon Valley and Bay areas where R&D decision makers live.

This could prove to be a massive influencing factor in the phasing out of ICE. Copper mines, especially when talking about greenfield discoveries, run incredibly deep and can take a decade to develop from discovery to production when taking into account permitting, finance and construction, according to CRU. Even a lithium salt deposit can take several years to develop.

Click here to continue reading...

Subscribe to the RSD email list and get the latest resource stock activity directly to your inbox, for free.

Part of the Stock Digest family of websites

Small Cap Stock Digest



Name Last Change
DOW 24575.60 0.70%
S&P 500 2638.60 0.22%
NASDAQ 7025.77 0.08%
TSX 15208.33 0.17%
TSX-V 592.76 0.00%

Resource Commodities

Name Last Change
Gold 1282.96 0.11%
Silver 15.36 0.26%
Copper 2.69 0.050
Platinum 794.70 0.47%
Oil 52.57 2.34%
Natural Gas 3.04 14.54%
Uranium 28.90 0.00%
Zinc 1.18 0.00%