Part of the Stock Digest group of websites: Visit Tech Stock Digest  

Why the Lithium Bear Case Is Wrong

Morgan Stanley was recently out with a report that recommended selling shares of lithium companies because it expects a sharp drop in prices as new supply comes online.

Morgan Stanley is wrong. Or it's late getting positioned in the lithium trend and is trying to send stocks lower so it can buy them.

Either way, shame on Morgan Stanley.

Here’s its nutshell version: Lithium prices will drop 45% by 2021 — from $13,375 to $7,332 per tonne — as new supply comes online, mainly from Chile. While there is a lithium deficit in 2018, there will be a surplus from 2019 onwards. Sales of electric vehicles would have to reach 31% of global sales in 2025 to “clear the market.”

While many have come out in opposition of Morgan Stanley’s position, the most credentialed is probably Simon Moores, CEO of Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, a London-based consultancy that monitors lithium prices globally.

According to Simon:

"Don’t usually comment on forecasts but the Morgan Stanley lithium one is ridiculous. When you understand even the basics of lithium, cathode and battery plants, and auto majors plans you realise the Morgan Stanley scenario has a 1 percent chance of happening."

And that’s because simply having lithium resources in the ground does not mean you can get them out in an economic fashion in time to supply the market. Chile does have a lot of lithium (the most in the world, actually), but infrastructure needs to be built to extract it and the lithium still needs to be processed.

New supply never just comes online in mining. It always takes longer than expected when dealing with permitting, locals, technical planning, financing, and construction.

As Simon Moores put it in an article he penned for El Mercurio, Morgan Stanley supposes 500,000 tonnes per year of production from Chile, and that “will not happen.”

Lithium brine operations typically take seven years to come online. Morgan Stanley is calling for surplus next year.

After calling the Morgan Stanley report “wrong” and “misleading”, Moores went on to say that, “In the face of demand that increases significantly in the short and long term, we expect global average prices to remain above US$10,000 in the foreseeable future.”

It’s no secret we’re extremely bullish on energy metals around here. That includes lithium, cobalt, graphite, vanadium, rare earths, and base metals like copper and nickel.

Click here to continue reading...

Subscribe to the RSD email list and get the latest resource stock activity directly to your inbox, for free.

MARKET SUMMARY

INDICES

Name Last Change
DOW 24100.50 2.06%
S&P 500 2599.95 1.95%
NASDAQ 6910.67 2.31%
TSX 14595.07 1.06%
TSX-V 555.38 0.00%

Resource Commodities

Name Last Change
Gold 1238.38 0.29%
Silver 14.57 1.17%
Copper 2.76 0.000
Platinum 787.00 0.000
Oil 51.20 2.70%
Natural Gas 3.83 7.76%
Uranium 28.53 0.35%
Zinc 1.22 0.00%

@RSDigest ON TWITTER

Part of the Stock Digest family of websites
Small Cap Stock Digest