Economic Geologist Joe Mazumdar Weighs in on the Future of Major Gold Miners

 

Are major gold-producing companies too big to fail? Not necessarily, Joe Mazumdar, economic geologist at Exploration Insights, said at the Metals Investor Forumin Vancouver last week. He emphasized that ultimately large gold producers will need to evolve in order to remain profitable.

In his presentation, Mazumdar focused on research he has done on eight North American gold producers and one Australian firm. They have a cumulative market cap of $85 to $90 billion, and together hold gold reserves of about 360 million ounces. In total, they produced 20 percent of the world’s gold in 2016, generating $30 billion in revenue.

Many investors find these large companies appealing, Mazumdar noted. And for good reason — he said that of the nine firms he looked at, most with market caps of over $10 billion beat the GDX benchmark by an average of 15 percent last year. That average was weighed down by Goldcorp’s (TSX:G,NYSE:GG) underperformance.

“The share price returns indicate that larger gold producers, those with big market caps over $10 billion, can still outperform their benchmarks. Meaning that they’re still alive and kicking. Endangered, but they’re still going,” he said.

Producers with market caps under $10 billion had a higher average outperformance of 23 percent thanks to IAMGOLD (TSX:IMG,NYSE:IAG); however, excluding IAMGOLD they underperformed by 9 percent overall.

A number of the nine gold producers Mazumdar looked at also had good average free cash flow yield last year. The average was 4 percent, and he said that Newcrest Mining (ASX:NCM), Newmont Mining (NYSE:NEM) and Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX,NYSE:ABX) are “still good value” because their free cash flow yields exceeded that average. Free cash flow allows companies to pay dividends, buy back shares and service their debt.

He considers Kinross Gold (TSX:K,NYSE:KGC) to be volatile as its investing activities have dropped its free cash flow yield into negative territory. Negative free cash flow drains a company’s working capital, forcing it to raise funds through divestments, debt or equity.

Mazumdar noted that while free cash flow is desirable, sometimes it comes at a price — for example, some of the companies he looked at increased their treasuries last year by divesting non-core assets and losing some of their reserves. “Investors appear to be alright with large gold producers’ reserves declining [in the near term] because they are looking more for the free cash flow generation from these companies,” he explained.

Even so, he suggested that reserves shouldn’t be ignored. The major gold producers he researched saw their reserve profiles experience a 4-percent year-on-year decline in 2016, and not all of them are prioritizing exploration spending. On average, the companies spent about 3 percent of their revenue, or $900 million, on exploration last year.

To continue reading please click link http://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/precious-metals-investing/gold-investing/joe-mazumdar-gold-miners/?mqsc=E3885715